• LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

CPAs & Advisors to the Cannabis Industry Since 2009 Schedule An Appointment

Bridge West LLC
  • About Us
    • Firm Overview
    • Leadership
    • Our Companies
    • Industry Affiliates
    • International Affiliations
  • Services
    • 280E Mitigation
    • IRS and State Audit Assistance
    • Advisory Services
    • License Application Advisory Services
    • Business Valuation
    • Financial Statement Audit and Other Attest Services
    • Tax Compliance
    • Outsourced Accounting Services
    • Investment Advisory
    • Technology Services
  • Industries
    • Cultivator
    • Processor
    • Dispensary
    • Vertical
    • Hemp
    • CBD Retail and E-commerce Operators
  • Events
  • Cannabis News
    • CannaBlog
    • Podcast
    • Webinar
    • Videos
  • Client Access
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Menu Menu

Supreme Court Justice Thomas Weighs in on Federal Cannabis Prohibition

CannaBlog By Jim Marty, CPA, CEO

Bridge West CPAs and Advisors to the Cannabis Industry

gavel and marijuana leaf

On June 28, 2021, Justice Thomas issued a statement respecting the denial of certiorari in the case of Colorado cannabis company, Standing Akimbo, LLC v. the United States.  The Supreme Court decided not to hear the case and let the lower court’s decision uphold Internal Revenue Code section 280E and the Internal Revenue Services’ right to subpoena records. However, Justice Thomas issued a stern warning to the other branches of the Federal Government.

Justice Thomas noted, “Once comprehensive, the Federal Government’s current approach is a half in half out regime that simultaneously tolerates and forbids local use of marijuana.” He added that this is a “contradictory and unstable state of affairs that strain the basic principles of federalism.” The full text of his statement is attached and is worth a word-for-word read.

So, what does this mean? Here is my interpretation and insights:

In spite of not hearing this case, the Supreme Court Justices are keeping a close eye on the cases that are percolating up from the lower courts.  If Congress and the Executive branch don’t reach an agreement, the Supreme Court may hear a future case.  While some may cheer this on, the outcome could be a disaster for the cannabis industry.

This is because the Supreme Court will likely uphold federalism, the Federal Government’s right, and power to overturn state law and enforce Federal law as the supreme law of the land.  This is a basic tenant of our constructional form of a national government.  It goes back to the Whiskey Rebellion during George Washington’s second term in the Fall of 1794.

That event has many similarities to our current cannabis situation.  You may recall from your history classes when Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton imposed an excise tax on whiskey, a large group of western Penniveined farmers refused to pay it. They were supported by the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and the Governor which passed a law exempting the state from the tax.

As a side note, in colonial days, whiskey was served at every meal, even to children with water, as a disinfectant.  It was also a way for Western wheat farmers to transport their harvests to the Eastern cities in a more compact distilled form.  So, we are not talking about a luxury tax here.

Hamilton and Washington raised a militia, (the U.S. Government had no standing army at that time) and marched west from Philadelphia, the then seat of our young republic’s government.  The rebellion ended peacefully.

The point here is this incident firmly established the Federal right to tax and overrule state law.  This is the principle of Federalism that has been in effect for over 200 years.  How long can the States flout this principle when it comes to their, and their citizens’ desire to have legal marijuana?

Justice Thomas raised this very issue. “If the Government (Federal) is now content to allow States to act “as laboratories” and try novel social and economic experiments, then it might no longer have authority to intrude on the States’ core police powers … to define criminal law and protect the health, safety, and welfare of their citizens.”  He is saying here that this is not simply about legal marijuana, but the very principles of Federalism itself!  He ends by offering a solution.

“A prohibition on intrastate use or cultivation of marijuana may no longer be necessary or proper to support the Federal Government’s piecemeal approach.”  He is saying fix this, or we will.

Some key words in this last sentence deserve analysis.  He uses the words “necessary” but also “proper.”  Is he asking the question, is it proper to have a federal prohibition on cannabis when the citizens of over 30 states have said they want it to be legal?

Another key word that he uses is “intrastate.”  This is what many cannabis business owners may want, no cross-state border transporting of cannabis products.  As I have said in the past, this protects the industry from having to compete with big pharmaceutical, tobacco, and alcohol companies.  It is also exactly what was proposed in the last Congress by now former Senator Cory Gardener and Senator Elizabeth Warren in the States Act legislation that remained in committee.

In its current version, The States Act would keep cannabis illegal at the Federal level but would allow the States to regulate cannabis as they see fit.  A solution that Justice Thomas could agree with.

Will it happen during this Congress? Not likely in my opinion. It seems whether the Democrats or Republicans are in control, common-sense legislation, like the States Act and the Safe Banking Act, cannot get out of committee for a floor vote where they would probably pass with bi-partisan support.

Anyone interested in these issues should write your congressmen and women and Senators and attach a copy of Justice Thomas’s statement.

Stay tuned…

Newsletter Registration

Recent Posts

  • 2023 Farm Bill
  • Cannabis C-Corps: Filing Requirements & Penalties for Not Extending
  • Minnesota Cannabis Updates 2023: Current License Holders
  • Why You Should Outsource Accounting for Your Cannabis Business
  • Updated Cannabis Industry Events

Services

280E Mitigation

IRS and State Audit Assistance

Cannabis and Hemp Advisory Services

Cannabis License Application Advisory

Business Valuation

Audit and Assurance

Tax

Outsourced Accounting Services

Investment Advisory

Technology Services

Resources

Contact

Events

CannaBlog

Leadership

Client Access

Serving all cannabis legal states

Headquarters:
7900 International Drive, Suite 800
Bloomington, MN 55425
(303) 651-0304
View Map >

© Bridge West LLC™ 2023 Privacy Policy
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Five Challenges Facing Multi-State Operators That can be Overcome With an E...Learning the Landscape: NY Cannabis Licensing Requirements
Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

OKLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only